Blog
The Evidence Keeps Arriving
New evidence, new actors, new dependencies. The duology’s arguments measured against the world as it moves.
Explore the Duology
Diagnosis, exposure, and the instruments to reclaim control.
Meet the Author
Thirty years inside the machine. Now naming what it does.
Read the Reviews
Peer-reviewed by the people this book was written for.
The Case File
The duology prosecutes digital dependency across five control planes.
This blog follows the prosecution as new evidence arrives.
Every claim is sourced, every actor is named, and nothing is retracted without proof.
Subscribe and follow the case, or read about it later when someone else writes the comfortable version.
Digital Sovereignty Today is Dion Wiggins’s personal blog, publishing 5+ posts a day on real-world events, developments, and shifts in digital power as they happen.
Sign up for the newsletter to be notified when it launches.
The Digital Sovereignty Imperative Is Live
This website is the public home of a duology that prosecutes digital dependency and builds the instruments to dismantle it. The evidence is assembled here, the findings are published here, and the case is built in the open.
The books exist because of a question that should have been answered thirty years ago and was not: who actually holds the power when permission ends?
On 16 February 2026, ABC News revealed that Canadian transcription provider VIQ Solutions had subcontracted Australian court transcription work to e24 Technologies in India, in direct violation of Commonwealth contracts prohibiting offshoring. Thousands of files from the Federal Circuit and Family Court, including domestic violence cases, child custody disputes, and national security hearings, had been accessed by unauthorised foreign personnel. VIQ staff had raised concerns as early as August 2025. Management dismissed them as rumours. The system appeared compliant. The data had already left the country. The contracts said it could not.
Four months later, on 12 June 2026, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick sent Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei a letter barring every foreign national, including Anthropic’s own foreign national employees, from accessing its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models. Anthropic was given 90 minutes to comply. It disabled both models for every customer because it could not verify nationality in time. Three days after launch, Anthropic’s most capable models were gone.
Neither of these were malfunctions. They were demonstrations of how digital sovereignty actually fails: not through invasion or sabotage, but through dependencies that were written into the contracts and the code on the day the systems were deployed.
This duology prosecutes those dependencies across five control planes: technical, legal, commercial, execution, and narrative. Volume 1, Illusion and Prosecution, proves that what 195 nations call digital sovereignty is revocable permission sustained by upstream actors. Volume 2, Rupture and Correction, documents what happens when nations stop tolerating that condition and start building enforceable authority under constraint.
The Governing Charter and the Methodological Charter are published on this site in full, because this work holds itself to the same evidentiary standard it demands of others. The glossary defines the operational language the field was missing. The table of contents is available so any reader can judge the scope before committing.
This blog will publish selected findings, track the events that continue to validate the thesis, and extend the prosecution beyond the printed page. Each post follows the power with brutal and often uncomfortable honesty, because the author’s job is to assemble the evidence, build the case, and provide an interpretation. The reader’s job is to follow the case, examine the citations, and deliver the verdict.
The first exhibit follows.