Reviews
This book picks fights worth having about who owns the digital future.
The people building, governing, and contesting that future had something to say about it.
Explore the Duology
Diagnosis, exposure, and the instruments to reclaim control.
Meet the Author
Thirty years inside the machine. Now naming what it does.
See the Pushback
Not everyone is happy being named and called out.
The Conversation
Digital sovereignty is still a contested idea. Some of the sharpest minds in technology policy, infrastructure, and governance read this book and pushed back, agreed, or both.
Their responses are collected here, not as endorsements, but as evidence that the conversation this book demands is already underway.
About These Reviews
These reviews represent early feedback from peer reviewers, policy practitioners, and specialists engaged during the review process. They will be joined by post-publication responses as the conversation grows.
My sincere thanks to every reviewer who gave this work their time and scrutiny.

Dr. Joseph Sweeney

Mr Wiggins' book demonstrates the inexorable conclusion that in order for a company to truly have autonomy, it must have digital sovereignty. Using real world examples and working from first principles using his vast knowledge of AI, Mr Wiggins demonstrates the manner by which a State can be captured by reliance on AI and how the barriers to exit to the market can trap a state into reliance upon another nation's ideology via the back door of government reliance upon non-sovereign AI.
Mr Wiggins' book is a timely and necessary warning into the new form of warfare - digital hegemony and how the lines are being drawn between East and West forcing compliance through soft power exerted by the recommendations policy and the promise of AI bringing a more consistent, safe and harmonious future.


Dr. Yury Sharshov
and independent researcher.

This book offers a timely and compelling examination of digital sovereignty, moving beyond the usual discussion of data ownership and technological independence to ask a more fundamental question: who ultimately controls the systems on which states and institutions increasingly depend? Drawing on the rapid expansion of AI and digital infrastructure, the author demonstrates how technological dependency can quietly become strategic dependency, creating forms of influence that are difficult to see until genuine autonomy is required.
The real value of the book lies in the framework it provides for answering that question: clear definitions, the Five-Pillar Framework that provides a clear structure for examining the different dimensions of digital control, and the Digital Sovereignty Operating System that establishes a practical operating logic for determining whether authority actually survives external constraints. Rather than treating sovereignty as a declaration, certification, or aspiration, the book provides a structured way to test where authority resides, how it can be constrained, and whether it remains enforceable when circumstances change.


Robin Simpson

In this two volume masterpiece of AI governance, Wiggins leverages his 35 years of global C-level IT experience to expose the myths behind vendor claims of AI and data sovereignty. Citing hundreds of contemporary case studies, he demonstrates how supposed sovereignty proved a chimera when access to foreign infrastructure, services and tools was suddenly and unilaterally terminated due to political, legal or ideological influence in foreign jurisdictions.
With the rigour and meticulous research normally reserved for academic works, Wiggins not only provides compelling evidence of how these myths are weaponised, but also guidance on how to determine your own level of risk; how to prepare to defend against denial of service and how you can begin to claw back real sovereignty - as an individual, as an enterprise or as a nation.

Digital Sovereignty Today is Dion Wiggins’s personal blog, publishing 5+ posts a day on real-world events, developments, and shifts in digital power as they happen.
Sign up for the newsletter to be notified when it launches.

Les Hales

Discussions on sovereignty were a central theme in the case for the United Kingdom leaving the EU, but the word was narrowly interpreted as the ability to set one's own laws. Policymakers failed to see that technology would become foundational to how citizens, businesses, and governments function, not merely a supporting tool. Outsourcing sold the lie that providers could run your IT systems so you could "concentrate on your business." The truth is that many companies don't have a business without their IT.
Mr. Wiggins' book on digital sovereignty is a comprehensive analysis of the risks faced by all in the ongoing transformation to a digital society. Essential reading for those who want to "take back control."


Robin Joffe

History is filled with so many examples of countries and industries, and even companies, that failed because they ignored major, fundamental shifts in power. Digital sovereignty represents one of those shifts. The consequences of getting it wrong are not theoretical any longer. Businesses can lose control of their critical data, face dependence on external technologies, and see even their valuations decline rapidly, which exposes shareholders to risks they never recognized or understood.
On a personal level, individuals may even discover that some of the biggest assets they have, their identities, even their freedom, exist inside systems that they don't control. Dion Wiggins brings a lot of needed attention to an issue that every single board member, investor, executive, and even government policy maker should be thinking about. Ignorance of digital sovereignty is not going to only create major costs, but may even see some countries and companies lose their sovereignty. The future wars are not going to be fought only on the battlefield, but rather in the digital arena, and those who control it will control everything.


Viktor Mirovic

I first worked with Dion Wiggins when he was a Vice President at Gartner and I was advising governments and enterprises across Asia and the Netherlands on technology strategy. He was already prosecuting the questions that would become this duology: who actually holds the power when the contract changes, when the vendor withdraws, when the permission expires. Twenty years later, he has built the most precise analytical framework in the field for answering those questions. The Survivability Condition alone forces every government, every board, and every procurement team to confront whether their sovereignty is structural or decorative, and in my experience, no one who applies it honestly comes away comfortable with the answer.
In September 2026, we engaged Wiggins as an independant voice to speak at the NUJUM16 sovereign AI compute launch in Amman, Jordan, as both keynote speaker and panellist. The room held government officials, infrastructure investors, and technology leaders from across the Levant who are building sovereign compute capacity from the ground up and who cannot afford to build it wrong. Wiggins did not deliver theory. He walked the room through the five control planes and demonstrated, with named actors and dated evidence, exactly how digital dependency is engineered into contracts, procurement frameworks, and infrastructure architecture before anyone in the room realises sovereignty has already been signed away. I have spent twenty-five years in venture capital and technology investment, and I have never seen a room of that seniority change direction during a single session. This duology is not a contribution to the field. It is the field's first serious foundation.


Michael Mudd

I advise governments and international organisations across Africa and Asia on technology strategy, and the single most persistent obstacle in that work is the absence of a framework that speaks to their actual conditions. Nearly everything available on digital sovereignty assumes the reader controls the infrastructure, sets the standards, or sits in the room where trade terms are written. My clients do not. They inherit dependency as a condition of participation, and until now there has been no structured way to assess what that dependency costs, what it exposes, and whether it can be survived if the provider withdraws. The Survivability Condition that Wiggins introduces gives them exactly that instrument, and it works as well in Nairobi or Manila as it does in any Western capital.
What makes this duology genuinely different from everything else in the field is that the sovereignty models are not graded against a Western benchmark. The GCC, ASEAN, and African trajectories are analysed on their own terms, against their own structural conditions, and in several cases the analysis concludes they are further ahead than the nations that claim to lead the conversation. For anyone advising governments that have been told for decades that sovereignty means buying the right Western technology stack and hoping the licence is not revoked, this work provides the first honest alternative.


